And then the original authors summarized the entire body of work that had looked at this and me and some co-authors, we have a tool – have a physical tool – that will also tell you if a body of work has what you call, "evidential value." The alarm's bell for me came up recently, maybe a year or so ago when a team of researchers in Switzerland failed to replicate it. I wasn't aware of it until maybe 2003/2004. On if an alarm bell went off when he first heard about "power poses" But I think it's useful to keep those two separate, so Dana Carney and Amy Cuddy have thought of this from different perspectives one much more basic science, the other much more in terms of giving advice. So maybe the scientific foundation was exaggerated or over perceived. On if Cuddy's motivational talk was grounded with scientific research I think of that talk of more a motivational speaker, more than a scientific presentation. And so, I think it's important to distinguish between the regional, narrow, a little dry paper that came out in 2010, that Dana's talking about and then the TED Talk, which is inspired by that study but also talks a lot by Amy Cuddy's personal experiences. I can't imagine they were thinking about a TED Talk at the time. On if the researchers reached these conclusions to give a TED Talk
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |